Teaching people to use ChatGPT has become a tool for many people to make a million dollars a month

These two days Wu Enda novelty out of the developer Prompt Engineering course 1.5 hours (with OpenAI personnel involved), the most critical thing is that it is also professional, authoritative, free. Students who have learned machine learning and deep learning must know him very well, not much to say here.

Suddenly I remembered a list of knowledge planets used by ChatGPT that I saw a while ago. Many planets are properly harvesting users, allowing them to pay hundreds of dollars to enter the planet and enter the group, and only a short time to seize huge profits, which can only be said to be quite black-hearted.

In fact, it seems that the experience of using ChatGPT now, to use ChatGPT relatively well only need the most critical steps can:

1, registered good GPT (really will not spend a few simple dollars a treasure to get)

2, first learn the basic questioning Prompt skills (such as the use of some key symbols)

3, learn some high-level instructions (these instructions usually do not have to memorize, when needed, Baidu search on the next)

The two hottest products are ChatGPT and MidJourney. I believe that many people just don't want to toss themselves and directly pick "as leeks", but when you think about it, it's really not necessary, because it's really nothing costly, and after you practice doing it once, it will become your own The experience of playing other products in the future, why not do it?

If you click on all kinds of selling class account or details to see will know, good guys, everywhere reveals anxiety, temptation, easy and good money. See a may not feel so strong, you more open several, search ChatGPT topic (do not even need to search, the platform will naturally present to you), found, the routine are the same, depending on which one you can not hold the wallet to turn out.

We look back and think carefully, these and the previous sale of "three days proficient in Java, comprehensive practical courses", "five days proficient in SEO, fast money secrets" what is the difference between these classes, really learn these classes, it is not possible to "touch the fish to count the money" every day? The answer of course is not, you earn money depends on market demand, depending on your output content, products have no better than other products on the market to solve the user's pain points, when you hold a hammer in your hand to find the stone you are prone to a lot of unrealistic fantasies, fantasies about how they can how, fantasies about how much they can at least monthly income, unfortunately, 90 percent of people are just to make up the number of The leek is just.

I have seen friends share some screenshots of the course, after reading my first thought is not how useful this stuff, but I seem to have seen somewhere? Many of them are carrying the content shared by others on the Internet, especially a lot of content and ideas are just simple second creation only, relatively rough base, nothing too much useful value.

Summarize the current consumer market mainstream GPT money making play, mainly such several:

1. Those with development capability directly retrieve OpenAI's API, provide services on a vertical demand and make money on service fees.

2、Use ChatGPT to generate some marketing copy and publish it online directly or further as video scripts to produce videos.

3. Combine with MidJourney to provide services such as drawing or painting avatars for people.

First look at the first category, this category for many developers may be more realistic, but in the current era of this AI applications are springing up, is it really so good money? Not necessarily. The second category, with the gradual popularity of AI generated content, many people want to rely on it to earn a wave, but this is a unilateral good idea, you stand in the perspective of the platform to think about the problem, the platform will let these "nothing nutritious" AIGC content to pull down their own tone? Will the platform pay a little attention to the promotion and reduce the push? The third category, or the problem of supply and demand, the initial period may indeed eat a lot of people to the dividend, but with the surge in service population, the whole income level is not so much, with the stall competition a reason.

So, the laws of history do not lie, back to the essence, this can make money or a probability game, and with the gradual maturation of the market and the influx of more and more competitors, this probability will be further diluted.

Of course, it's not that ChatGPT can't make money, but there are several categories of people:

The first group of people, those who sell classes, earn not from the GPT tool itself, but from the GPT gimmick and imagination.

The second category of people, down-to-earth developers or small teams, who have found a certain niche in the consumer demand market niche, such as some useful tool websites, relying on the hierarchical package of functional membership service system to earn money recognized by the market.

Finally, also once again to some students who are torn wandering to buy some advice, first, think about what their purpose is in the end, is to make money with it? Or simply want to improve the efficiency of their own production learning? If it is the latter, you can also search the Internet, take a look, in fact, now there are very many free materials can meet your needs, may spend more step first to seek their own public programs and solutions. Secondly, many students who want to buy classes impulsively in their hearts mostly see some so-called "success stories", their screenshots are always so attractive, always let people have the feeling that the opportunity to buy now is gone, and then a lot of screenshots are faked, or he only intercepted the data of the brightest moments, the other mediocre data he And did not give you see, the last is even just a few sentences of text description, there is no argument to prove the truth of what he said, I hope that you polish your eyes, do not be confused by some falsehoods.